TRUMP’S SENATORS: STAYING TRUE NO MATTER WHAT

As the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump moves into its second week, little has occurred that challenges the conventional

wisdom it will end in an acquittal. Almost no cracks have appeared in Trump's wall of 53 loyal Republican senators. Polling shows the public wants testimony from

Mick Mulvaney

witnesses like White House Chief-of-Staff Mick Mulvaney, former National Security Advisor John Bolton, and State Secretary Mike Pompeo. The public also supports subpoenaing executive branch documents Trump ordered withheld.

Whether either occurs remains in doubt and depends on four Republicans joining 47 Democrats in voting for witnesses and documents.

The slavish devotion Republican senators show for Trump, quite frankly, stuns us and we debated the possible reasons. We can’t get into those 53 heads, but we can examine

possible explanations, given what we know about human nature and the current political environment. It seems likely different considerations motivate different senators, so we can’t paint with too broad a brush. Still, we have some ideas.

The Dark Side

Some Republican senators, like some Democratic senators, operate on raging ideological convictions. As for Trump’s supporting senators, we see their objectives rooted in troubling, dark motivations. They

have  seen Trump at his worst and like what they see. These senators will, therefore, do anything necessary for protecting him and the power he wields. Put bluntly, this group of senators likes, maybe even adores, Trump’s white nationalism and xenophobia. His  “good people on both sides"

response after the Charlottesville Unite the Right rally in August 2017 provided this group with confirmation that they had found their man.

Senators in this category no doubt see Trump’s potential conviction as an existential threat to their way of looking at the world. They need Trump in office for the support and legitimacy he gives their cause. They cannot tolerate anything that might take him out of his lofty position. These senators live in a dark, unredeemable world reflecting the worst in America, demonstrating that no matter this nation’s greatness, we aren’t a perfect people.

The Usual Suspects

Much of the attention in the debate over

witnesses and documents focuses on four or five  GOP “moderates” who might break from the team that Trump coaches and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell quarterbacks. Whenever a controversial, party-line dispute erupts, the media and some Democrats parade them around as “getable” – Republican senators

who might jump ship and vote against Supreme Court nominee or, in the impeachment trial, in favor of issuing subpoenas for witnesses and documents. Their names are so familiar now as to (almost) not need repeating here – Susan Collins of Maine, Utah’s Mitt Romney, Cory Gardner of Colorado, Lisa Murkowski from Alaska, and Tennessee’s Lamar Alexander. For all the noise and false hope they  generate, however, almost always they get on board and stick with the team. Nothing has happened yet in this saga suggesting otherwise though, as Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer says, “Hope springs eternal.”

Laissez les Bon Temps Rouler 

United States Senator sounds like a good job.

It  pays $174,000 a year (median U.S. household income is about $62K), provides generous health care and retirement benefits, and offers world-wide travel opportunities. It also comes

with perks -- people return your phone calls, you appear on television a lot, you get called “Chairman” if you run a committee. It’s sometimes a springboard to the presidency. We won’t even get into all the  money – making opportunities, above board and otherwise. We assume it’s the best job many senators ever had or will have. No wonder they work so hard at getting re-elected.

We’re confident many of Trump’s senators fall into this category – men and women who’ve recognized how good things are and won’t do anything that might jeopardize keeping the office. We think these Republicans have made a calculation – a business decision – that remaining in the senate, as they so desperately want, requires sticking with Trump. They’ve seen Trump punish wayward souls with Tweetstorms, insults in the broadcast media, and, ultimately, primary opponents. 

                   

We suspect these senators act only tangentially for ideological reasons. Sure, one or two things – confirmation of right-wing federal judges, property rights, disdain for federal regulation – motivates some of them, but that’s often secondary.  We know they’ve forgotten traditional Republican fiscal responsibility because they accept Trump’s historical deficits. They’ve been silent in the face of his coziness with

Vladimir Putin and other human rights violators. They haven’t promoted democratic values by insisting on a fair impeachment trial in the senate they control. We wonder how much they value government with three co-equal branches, defined by a system of checks and balances.   

   

We also think it unlikely their motivation resides in dedication to or affection for Trump, or from respect for his intellect and policy acumen. Many senators reportedly shake their heads at his incompetence and ignorance of simple issues, while cringing at the difficulty he has with complex problems.

This cohort of senators – we don’t know its size – most fears losing their perks. Knowing how Trump treats those who stray, they can’t take the chance of putting daylight between themselves and the man in the White House. Having made their calculation, they sit through the trial, listen fretfully to the utterly persuasive case presented by the House managers, will vote for Trump’s acquittal, then return to their regularly scheduled lives of privilege. Yes, let the good times roll.

A GLIMPSE INTO OUR INNER BEINGS: WHAT WE READ

In this space over the last 3 ½ years, we’ve acknowledged drawing on books we’ve read for ideas on matters we see as worth writing

about. We’ve pointed readers to books (The Half Has Never Been Told, The Color of Law, and The Warmth of Other Suns) we regard as essential for understanding race in America. We reviewed one of them (The Color of Law) in explaining America’s chronic housing discrimination problem. And, we drew on Madeline Albright’s Fascism: A Warning, in sounding the alarm about President Donald Trump’s dangerous affinity for dictators.

                      

Reading books defines each of our lives, beyond the utility of their content. We find

solace in the books strewn around our homes and offices and packed onto our shelves. None of us can contemplate a life without books. But, what do we read and why? With each of us, there’s a story offering insight into who we are and how we’ve evolved.   

Henry: Diversity, Diversity, Diversity

Many books I’ve read have taken me places I

couldn’t have imagined and offered context for the jumbled exploration of my own thoughts. From my earliest years, reading provided a spiritual experience in which I could join others in exploring humanity and personal relationships. Even in childhood, I read many

different things in many different areas.  I still do: science fiction like Isaac Asimov’s The Foundation Trilogy and Parable of the Sower by Octavia Butler; physics, like The Great  Unknown by Marcus Du Sautoy

and Alan Lightman’s Einstein’s Dreams; religion, including The Bible and A History of God by Karen Armstrong; fiction,including mysteries like Walter Mosley’s Down the River Unto the Sea and classics like Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man, John Updike’s Rabbit Run, and The Alexandria Quartet by Lawrence Durrell. In keeping current on events of the day (and in step with my co-authors) I read Between the World and Me by Ta-Nehisi Coates.

                    

Each of these works, and many others I’ve read, remain part of my fabric. This approach

has a drawback. Sometimes, when I go into a bookstore, I find myself happy and sad at the same time – happy because I’m amidst so much knowledge I’d hope I can absorb and sad because I can’t read it all.    

Rob: A Change is Gonna Come

If 25 years ago I’d been asked for an explanation of what I read and why, the answer would have been quite different than what I offer today. Before the late ‘90s, with the exception of trashy

“airport novels” I occupied  myself with on cross country flights, I read nonfiction. My bookshelf included volumes on elections (Theodore H. White’s The Making of the President series), analyses of World War II

(Richard Overy’s Why  the Allies Won), political memoirs (Robert McNamara’s In Retrospect), and biographies of major historical figures (Robert Caro’s The Years of Lyndon Johnson series).

These books brought  me considerable knowledge about a few subjects and I thoroughly enjoyed reading them. But, as I see now, I was missing something. A change was coming.   

In 1999, a friend invited my wife and me into a couples book club. Under its rules, each

person took a turn at picking the book for quarterly dinner meetings. Book club membership changed my reading habits (and my life). During the ensuing 21 years, we’ve read 90 books, about half fiction. I found myself reading, and enjoying, A Confederacy of Dunces, John K. Toole’s wonderful, Pulitzer Prize winning novel  set in

New Orleans, where I once lived, and Stephen King’s 11/22/63,  a time travel novel that presented an entirely different perspective on the JFK assassination. 

My book club experience confirmed the wisdom in the old adage some writers live by: if you want facts, write nonfiction. If you want truth, write fiction. l took that to heart. My

book club experience in hand, and after my wife’s death, I  decided I’d try my hand at writing fiction. I began grabbing more and more novels. I still read lots of nonfiction, but I’m now a confirmed, dedicated fiction reader too.

Woodson: Choices and Goals

My book choices are influenced largely by my life choices and goals. With fewer days left to live than I’ve already lived and with goals remaining, I concentrate my reading on what furthers achievement of my goals.

                        

Because I am a property manager and real estate investor, I read a lot on real estate and economic matters (books like Capital in the Twenty-First Century by Thomas Piketty, Chris Hogan’s Everyday Millionaires, Joseph

Stiglitz’s People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent, and  Property Management Kit for Dummies by  Robert Griswold).  My interest in political and racial issues is satisfied by reading books like Doris Kearns Goodwin’s masterful Team of Rivals and the critically  important That Used to be Us: How America Fell Behind in the World and How We Can Comeback by Tom Friedman and Michael Mandelbaum, Dying of Whiteness by Jonathan Meltz, and

Bryan Stevenson’s Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption. Finally, because I participate in several Christian ministries, I read books

on religion, including Systematic Theology by Wayne Grudem, Instinct: The Power to Unleash Your Inborn Drive by T.D. Jakes, Eckhart Tolle’s A New Earth Awakening to Your Life’s Purpose, and The Seat of the Soul by Gary Zukav. Then there’s the Holy Bible. I read that too.

                         

As with Henry and Rob, my reading focus developed over time. It reflects life choices

I’ve  made because of my evolution as a person and as a professional, and through recognizing the limitations we all face as humans. Reading remains an essential part of my life.