Thursday, August 23, 2018

ROB AND HIS DAUGHTERS: AN OLD FAMILY TRADITION



We’ve written about parenting, describing the highs and lows of raising 13 children between us. Presently, Rob relates a long standing tradition in his family. 

The Method to Our Madness
On a recent warm summer night in the Kansas City suburbs, I sat hunched around the kitchen table of a hotel suite with my three daughters, poring over a scratch-off map of the United
States revealing the states and cities we’d visited as a quartet with the scrape of a quarter across the gold coating. It was opening night of our annual Daughter’s Weekend, two uninterrupted days devoted to father-daughter bonding. Our first activity was plotting the places we’d gone to in the 23 years we’ve carried on this tradition (ten states, 12 cities it turned out). Figuring out where we’d traveled let each of us reflect on the meaning of our yearly meetings to each other and to our family life.    

In the mid-90s, I pondered the reality of having three daughters from two marriages who lived in different places. A significant age gap separated them.  One was in college and the other two had just passed toddlerhood. I’d read plenty about the benefit to girls of developing strong relationships with their fathers – fewer teen pregnancies, less involvement with drugs, fewer entanglements in abusive intimate relationships. I wanted those things for my girls, though I knew no magic bullet existed. I could do everything right and things still might go to hell in a handbasket. 

What did I do? To make a long story short, I borrowed a practice from my wife’s family and made some adjustments. Ida and her three younger sisters occasionally headed off on jaunts they called “Sisters Weekend.” Husbands, boyfriends, and children weren’t invited. The Stewart sisters said these excursions helped them forge stronger bonds with each other. Could my daughters and I do something similar and get the same benefit? 

Being the way I am, I made up some rules:
  • We’d alternate between weekends at home (Houston) and taking trips.
  • This would be an annual event everyone could buy into and count on.
  • We’d share responsibilities. At home, each person would have meal preparation, clean-up duty, or a planning job, depending on maturity. On trips, while I paid for virtually everything in the early years, once the daughters grew up and became gainfully employed, we split meals, lodging, and entertainment, roughly according to ability to pay.
  • Trips would feature educational activities, not just entertainment, meaning museums and cultural centers as well as ball games and shows.
  •   No wives or brothers allowed.
  •  No work! I couldn’t draft briefs and motions and the girls had to finish their school work pre-trip.

I didn’t know if (a) the girls would buy into my idea or (b) if it would help in creating bonds between each of them and me or between them as sisters. When we started in 1996 at home in Houston, I hoped it would become a longstanding tradition, but I had no more than that – hope. 

Our Greatest Hits
Over the years we generally maintained that 1-1 ratio of home events to trips, though we make more trips now. We’ve seen some of America’s most intriguing cities,
2017 New Orleans-Left to Right: Murriel, Rob, Shaun, Kathryn
including New Orleans, Kansas City, Chicago, Denver, and Nashville. We’ve been to a remote lake resort (Wisconsin), taken college tours (Arkansas and North Carolina), visited museums (the Field Museum in Chicago, World War II in New Orleans, Country Music Hall of Fame in Nashville, Negro League Baseball in Kansas City, Crystal Bridges in Bentonville, Arkansas), and been entertained by comedians, dancers, and singers all over. We’ve eaten great meals (Emeril’s Delmonico in New Orleans, Arthur Bryant’s Barbeque in Kansas City), and scrounged for late night snacks. 

Did it Work?  You Bet it Did!
My daughters, Shaun, Murriel, and Kathryn and I don’t have perfect relationships, either father-daughter or sister-sister. We have disagreements, arguments, and spats with each other and occasionally about each other. We all have bones we could pick with each other. 

But nobody got into serious trouble and all three graduated from reputable colleges (Miami, Arkansas, Clemson/Cal-Berkeley). All have been gainfully employed during their adult lives. None depend on me or society. We’ve all chipped in to help each other from time to time, but no one requires more than the normal love and support good family members give each other. I’d call each a cherished friend and a loving daughter. 

Daughter’s Weekend doesn’t get credit for all that, of course. It is one weekend a year. The day-to-day work of their mothers, brothers, teachers, spiritual communities, and their own character played bigger roles in creating the good people my daughters have become.

I’ll always believe, though, another thing played a part -- the time I spent with them on those weekends, when they had my undivided attention and when nothing distracted them from feeling my love for them or theirs for me and for each other.

At the end of that Kansas City visit, as we piled into the car for the trip to the airport, Murriel asked, “Where are we going next year?”
“Atlanta, maybe?” Kathryn offered, scanning the rest of us.
“Fine with me,” I said, putting luggage into the trunk.
“Me too,” Shaun said. “Long live Daughters Weekend!”  
 
2016 Chicago - Left to Right:Rob, Shaun, Murriel,  Kathryn


                     

Thursday, August 16, 2018

STANDING OR KNEELING FOR THE NATIONAL ANTHEM: WHO’S A REAL PATRIOT?



Football season is upon us!  We’re ready to enjoy the nation’s most compelling sport, right?  As college football analyst Lee Corso might say, however, ‘not so fast.’  In addition to chattering about blitz packages and pass patterns, players, fans, and media once again find the sport embroiled in the now-racialized criminal justice/national

We feel compelled to discuss this topic because the issues underlying the debate symbolize important concerns in America’s political and legal fabric.  Earlier, on a different issue, we proudly called ourselves patriots because of our commitment to protecting this country’s democratic institutions and principles.  Those institutions and principles assure rights and opportunities for all Americans.  The criminal justice/national anthem debate implicates critical American values, so we will have our say.

The Kneeling, Blackballed Quarterback
In 2016, San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick,
a biracial American, began kneeling during the national
anthem in protest of racial injustice in the United States, including police shootings of young black men.  Kaepernick’s entire story is complex and we won’t detail it here.  Suffice it to say kneeling eventually helped get him blackballed and he hasn’t played since late 2016. Because no team would sign him, Kaepernick filed a lawsuit against the NFL.


Other players, nearly all African-American, began kneeling.  That was controversial,
of course, but when Trump slammed them at an Alabama political rally in 2017, he exposed other racial wounds in American society.  The image-obsessed NFL and its mostly Trump-friendly owners got nervous and began taking actions that would curb the protests.  The league at one time offered players financial support for community projects in exchange for ending the protests.  During this past off-season, the league formulated a rule requiring players to stand for the anthem or remain in the locker room while it’s played.  Some teams, however, said they’ll fine players if they don’t go onto the field and stand for the anthem, negating the league-mandated locker room option.

Free Speech?

Protesting players and their supporters often cast this as a free speech issue. It is and it isn’t.  As lawyers,we certainly
know the First Amendment to the United States Constitution  likely doesn’t apply in this circumstance.  The First Amendment operates as a limit on government, not as a general,
across-the-board grant of personal free speech rights applicable in all situations.  The NFL isn't the government.  No court, at least not on First Amendment grounds, can keep the NFL from enforcing whatever speech limits it wants on its players in the absence of a collective bargaining agreement addressing the issue. 

That legal principle doesn’t, however, end the inquiry. We’d note the NFL’s extensive entanglement with government, potentially suggesting a court should treat it as a state actor for free speech purposes.  Nearly every NFL team plays in a stadium built, at least in part, with tax dollars.  Extensive police presence at league games gives them the flavor of state-sponsored events.   The NFL’s close ties with the U.S. military only add to the connection between the league and the federal government.

Leaving aside this admittedly novel legal argument, the NFL has become so pervasive in our society that squashing a player’s ability to comment, symbolically, on an important political and social issue seems outdated, outmoded, and fundamentally unfair.  Entertainers, political figures, and business people engage in protected, symbolic speech all the time.  What makes professional athletes different?  The fact not many players in other leagues haven’t protested in the same way doesn’t really answer that question.

Zero Sum Game?
While the protests started as an effort to bring attention to race discrimination in the criminal justice system, almost single handedly, Trump turned them into a debate about who is patriotic and who isn’t.   Stand for the anthem and you’re a patriot, kneel and you’re not.  We should not forget our history.  Throughout the life of this nation groups of all kinds – blacks, women, religious minorities, the LBGTQ community -- have taken the route of peaceful, non-violent protest in securing rights majorities take for granted.  Protest has made our nation stronger.

During the Vietnam era, war protesters regularly wrapped the flag around their dissent.  They argued the best way to honor America, its traditions, and its institutions was ending our disgusting involvement in an immoral war that ultimately didn’t serve the national interest or enhance national security.  While the Johnson and Nixon administrations equated patriotism with support for the war, dissenters declared themselves the real patriots.

We see a parallel between Vietnam and the national anthem debate of today.  Maintaining the right to bring grievances against the government stands at the core of our democracy.  This nation rests on that foundation.  The fact the NFL technically isn’t the government doesn’t matter.  The NFL is such a big player in American life, if protests at NFL games represent the best way to challenge unjust police shootings, we should have protests at NFL games.  If players can’t protest at NFL games now, in the future, where else will some fascist-leaning leader say we can’t have protests?   

Think about that.