Friday, October 20, 2017

An American Political Agenda for 2018 and 2020: Six Suggestions for the Upcoming Election Cycles: Part 2

We recently fleshed out our proposals for a preferred message for candidates in the 2018 and 2020 elections.  This post concerns our second suggestion – that those seeking office offer ideas and a demeanor that can begin healing the racial and cultural fractures of the Trump era.  We know many believe campaigns should focus on economic issues and we agree.  We’ll get to economics in due course, but anyone who wants to serve as President (or in Congress) must offer the nation moral leadership that can bring us together as a people.  Jesus’s reported statement to Satan comes to mind. “Man does not live by bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.”

Writing on a Dirty Slate   
Reciting Trump’s parade of horribles doesn’t take long.  He has picked a fight with professional football players, most of them African- American.  We believe he did so largely to provoke racial animosity toward them, and by extension African-Americans generally, by his base supporters.  He equated people protesting discrimination with white supremacists and neo-Nazis.  Trump’s attitude toward African-American protesters borders on contempt. Before a national television audience that undoubtedly included many children, he called the players “sons of bitches,” though he’d earlier excused white supremacist protesters as “fine people.”  He targeted Muslim countries with a travel ban several lower federal courts found unconstitutional.  He disrespected Gold Star Families.  The list seems endless and grows daily.

Trump’s conduct goes far beyond possible illegality and crassness.  His behavior has inflamed racial passions in the nation and the body politic.  His followers now find free reign to act immorally and irresponsibly on racial matters.  White evangelicals remain loyal to him, despite his public vulgarity and racial dog whistling, perhaps because of it.  No political restraint exists on Trump and nothing compels him to hide his racism.  Trump shows no sign of a moral compass on racial division, making him either immoral or the ultimate cynic.  Regardless, the country suffers from having a man in the White House who further divides an already fractured nation.
Doing Better   
Nothing ordains this circumstance.  American political leaders have exhibited leadership that heals racial divisions.  On the tense night of April 4, 1968, Robert Kennedy stood on a flatbed truck in the heart of the ghetto in Indianapolis and announced Martin Luther King’s murder.  In what some see as one of the great political speeches ever, Kennedy asked blacks who might seek revenge against whites for King‘s murder to remember that his brother also had been killed “by a white man.”  Kennedy ended his six minute speech by telling the crowd that what America needed at the time was “love and understanding and compassion toward one another.”  Significantly, while many cities burned that night, Indianapolis remained calm.

During the 2008 general election, a woman at a town hall meeting in Minnesota said to Republican Presidential nominee John McCain she couldn’t trust Democratic nominee Barak Obama because he was “an Arab.”  McCain took the microphone and told the woman Obama wasn’t an “Arab,” but “a decent family man, citizen that I just happen to have disagreements with on fundamental issues and that’s what this campaign is all about.”  Trump didn’t take his cue from the nominee of his party.  He instead embarked on a shameful, multi-year campaign questioning Obama’s legitimacy as a native born American citizen eligible to serve as President.

As Kennedy and McCain demonstrated, American politicians do not always live in a cesspool fouled by the stench of racial and cultural bigotry and grievance.  They can rise to the occasion. Some get it right, at least some of the time.  We see this as another time for national statesmanship.

A Blueprint   Men and women seeking office in 2018, in response to the bankrupt racial and cultural politics of the Trump era, should at least pledge the following:

1.   Never equate any group or individual claiming racial supremacy with those protesting injustice and discrimination. That distinguishes America from so many other countries and truly would make America great.

2.   Recognize that peaceful protest represents the highest form of patriotism.  After all, unlike many other rights Americans exercise, the constitution specifically and unequivocally spells out that one.

3.   Express and exhibit a willingness to confront racial, ethnic, and religious differences with frank, respectful dialogue that neither patronizes people nor sugarcoats differences.

4.   Understand that civility and respect for people demonstrate strength and character, not weakness or timidity (and not what’s derisively called “political correctness”). 

5.   Study the history of racism and racial discord in America for enlightenment, recognizing that such inquiry need not breed guilt or resentment.

6.   Treat anyone who has lost a loved one, especially in service to the nation, with the utmost respect and dignity and not as a political weapon.

7.   Remember that what’s past is prologue and those who fail to learn from history’s mistakes are doomed to repeat them.

We could (and perhaps should) put other things on this list.  The comprehensiveness of the list, however, is not the point.  If the next President and other national leaders work at the items on this list, or one like it, America will become a better place and wake up from its current nightmare. 

Don’t you think so?     
           

          

        

Saturday, October 7, 2017

An American Political Agenda for 2018 and 2020: Six Suggestions for the Upcoming Election Cycles: Part 1

Recently we proposed six topics we’d like to see candidates in 2018 and 2020 emphasize. We disagreed about who might sign on to our ideas, a disagreement we explored in a follow-up post.  Leaving aside who was right or wrong about that, we recognize we must complete the job.  We now begin developing the details of our agenda.  To make our platform mean more than platitudes and slogans, we have to describe it in depth.

We started with restoring Presidential dignity.  The current occupant of the White House has disgraced the Presidency in innumerable ways, large and small.  Any candidate seeking to replace him must assure the citizenry he or she will discontinue the deplorable behavior now on display at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

An Early Start With No End   
Donald Trump’s trashing of the Presidency began with his 2016 campaign.  He mocked disabled persons, claimed an Indiana-born federal judge couldn’t fairly judge his case because of the judge’s Mexican heritage, insulted a Gold Star family, and urged supporters at his rallies to commit violent acts.  A few weeks before the election came the ultimate disgrace – his statements on the Access Hollywood tape in which he promoted sexual assault on women.  This litany tops his greatest hits list, but it’s not the whole story.

Worse than what happened in the campaign, Trump’s behavior has degenerated since he took office.  He equated white supremacists with those protesting bigotry.  He regularly attacks people he doesn’t like or who don’t buy into his world view. We find fighting social media wars with television hosts, athletes, and other private citizens unbecoming the President of the United States.  His targets usually have done nothing more than express their disagreement with Trump’s conduct or his policies.  His name calling ill serves the nation and promotes disrespect for the office he holds. The idea an American parent might need to restrict their child’s access to Presidential communication should dismay us all.  It also should say to anyone seeking the Presidency that, if elected, restoring the decorum of the office represents a high, pressing priority.

Why He Does It   
Trump’s behavior likely springs from his own apparent crassness and from political motives.  No one can do anything about the personal crassness; the fact he carried his uncivil behavior from the campaign into office should make that clear.  Not one piece of evidence exists that the man can change.  The idea taking office would mitigate his behavior was wishful thinking, fantasy, or both.

The political calculation, however, requires more nuanced consideration.  Trump also does what he does because he knows people in his base like it.  Support for this proposition rests in the consistent favorable approval rating he gets from about 35% of the electorate.  These voters see the same conduct we see, but it does not dissuade them from his side.

To the extent Trump’s fellow Republicans encourage his behavior by tolerating it, they bear responsibility for the damage he’s doing to the office.  The time has come for Republican office holders and the Republican rank and file to renounce his bad behavior because it disserves the country and their party.  One day a Republican unlike Trump will seek and win the office.  If current-day Republicans want that President to enjoy the respect the office should command, they need to stand up now and denounce Trump’s uncivil conduct, regardless of political consequences.  In other words, Republicans should understand that having the office won’t mean much if they don’t protect it now. Woodson’s admonition that Republicans should run on this principle rings true.  The President they save may be their own. 

A Pledge   
We think 2020 candidates for President (and Congressional candidates in 2018) should pledge to adhere to a code of conduct if elected.  This code would include:

·      A commitment against launching personal attacks on non-politician public figures and private citizens, including from social media platforms. 

·      Agreement not to insult people based on race, ethnicity, sex, religion, national origin, disability, or other characteristics unrelated to political and policy differences.

·      A commitment to call out bigotry, race-baiting, and religious intolerance without attempting to equate such behavior with anything or anybody. 

·      An absolute prohibition on inciting violence.
Some may regard our code as “political correctness” run amok.  We see this straw man argument as mainly an excuse for uncivilized, uncouth excess.  Treating citizens with dignity and respect does not deserve such derision.  In fact, none of these ideas strike us as particularly provocative.  It seems self-evident a President would, without hesitation, adhere to such norms.  But, right now, the President regularly violates each one and appears to relish doing so.  Since the current President won’t behave, before giving someone else the job, we need a pledge from candidates that he or she will.

Other ideas?