Showing posts with label Howard University. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Howard University. Show all posts

Monday, September 7, 2020

CHADWICK BOSEMAN: A SUPER HERO GONE TOO SOON LIFE, DEATH, AFRICAN AMERICANS, AND COLON CANCER

The August 28 death of actor Chadwick Boseman saddened the nation and the entertainment world and conjured up images of his groundbreaking role as Black Panther in one of the highest grossing films in the United States of 2018. Boseman’s death from colon cancer at 43 also provided a useful, if grim, reminder of the impact of the disease on African Americans and the need for effective counter measures in that population.

Boseman notoriously guarded his privacy, so he never told the world he’d been diagnosed with the disease in 2016. He kept acting, enjoying his Black Panther success while undergoing treatment.

 

A Short, Spectacular Career

Boseman grew up in Anderson, South Carolina, the son of a nurse and a textile worker. He earned a fine arts degree from

Howard University in 2000 and began a career focused on writing and directing. He only started studying acting because he hoped doing so would give him a better understanding of actors in his directing work. Though he kept writing plays, Boseman soon found success as an actor in television, beginning in 2003 with appearances in Third Watch and later in Law and Order, CSI:NY, and ER.

Boseman made his real mark in movies. In 2013, he played Jackie Robinson in 42, a movie that grossed $97 million against a budget of $40 million. Ironically, Boseman died on Jackie Robinson Day, the major league baseball players wear

Robinson’s No. 42.   A year after 42 Boseman portrayed legendary soul singer James Brown in Get on Up. Boseman in 2017 played a young Thurgood Marshall trying a rape case in Connecticut, long before Marshall became the nation’s first black U.S. Supreme Court Justice.  Then came Boseman’s biggest moment.


The Cultural Phenomenon of Black Panther

It’s difficult to overestimate the impact of Boseman’s work in Black Panther. Our March 8, 2018, post recorded our reactions to the film, reactions that demonstrated our individual approaches to entertainment, cultural phenomena, and racial issues. Woodson juxtaposed the film’s “confident and competent” depiction of people of color with the harsh portrayal presented by the current President of the United States. Rob viewed the picture in the context of other action movie franchises.  Henry, a long time Super Hero fan, discovered a movie that forged a spiritual connection with a world he’d longed for, but wasn’t sure he’d ever inhabit.

In tribute to the actor, Henry wrote, “I found immensely satisfying seeing a movie, in a genre in which I’ve reveled so long, depict a world that left no question of my own humanity and celebrated the notion people of African descent can be, and are, good or bad, human or inhuman, smart or not-so-smart, wise or unwise, compassionate or cruel.”  He continued, “Black Panther brought alive my own spirit and helped maintain a faith in humanity that’s been challenged in the last few years.”

For African Americans like Henry, who have worshiped in the Super Hero movie world for years, Bozeman’s performance provided hope. Death, rebirth, and courage brought the mythical hero to the hearts of people longing for a symbol rising above the reality of past bondage and continued oppression. Boseman, in the Black Panther role and in his portrayals of famous men, important men like Robinson, Brown, and Marshall, showed America people of color who altered history. They changed whispers to roars and helped move myth to reality. In tribute, Woodson observed, “Chadwick Boseman’s life and death expressed the urgency of now – embracing life’s calling and pursuing it to the end.”

As one of Henry’s grandchildren expressed it, “Black Panther is the baddest Super Hero ever.” In spite of Boseman’s enormous achievements by age 43, one can only imagine what his contributions might have been had he lived a normal life expectancy. Perhaps the fitting thing we should say now is, “Chadwick Boseman, forever.” 

 

A Dark Side and a Reality Check

Boseman’s life has been celebrated by celebrities and ordinary people for good reason. His death, however, conjured up harsh realities the nation ignores at its peril. He died of colon cancer as a young man. That fact creates a sobering circumstance that requires closer examination.

Blacks suffer from colon cancer at significantly

higher rates than other racial groups. Black men are 24 % more likely to develop colon cancer than whites, with
black women stricken 19% more often than whites.
African Americans have a 15-20% higher death rate from colon cancer than whites.

The explanations don’t differ much from the

explanations for other health disparities between the races – diet, obesity, lack of screening, lack of access to health care generally. Significantly, blacks develop the disease at younger ages than whites. Many doctors now suggest blacks get screened for colon cancer at 45, instead of 50, the age now normally recommended for such tests.

Even that might not have changed the outcome for Chadwick Boseman. He was 39 at the time of his diagnosis. A lower initial screening age might not have caught his disease early enough to have started treatment that would have extended his life beyond the 43 years he got. Outliers often exist and he apparently was one. Still, Boseman’s case, and his tragic death, remind the nation generally, and the African American population specifically, of the need for early testing and overall vigilance about a disease that can create such havoc.  

Getting an early colon cancer screening is something we whole heartedly recommend. 


 



 

Friday, August 14, 2020

BIDEN – HARRIS: A TICKET FOR THE AGES?


It’s done. Former Vice President Joe Biden
named California Senator Kamala Harris his vice presidential running mate. We tapped Harris as the favorite in our July 13 posting of odds on the contenders. Her selection didn’t come as a surprise, despite its historic nature. Now, she and Biden face two and a half months of campaigning in the weird world of a pandemic and resulting economic devastation against an unpopular, but cunning incumbent who’ll likely do anything to keep power.




The Person

The 55-year old Harris checks many boxes for a spot on a national ticket – elected three
times to statewide office in California, administrator of the second largest justice agency in America, experience on key senate committees (Judiciary and Intelligence). That experience and her education immunize her against tokenism charges. She ran for president in 2020 and acquitted herself well in the early debates, though she faded and dropped out before the primaries started. 

Harris represents several firsts. No black woman has been on a national ticket before nor has an Indian-American person of either gender. She’s the first graduate of a
historically black university (HBCU), Howard University, on a national ticket. Its alumni and former students include novelist Toni Morrison, civil rights leader Vernon Jordan, actors Phylicia Rashad and Chadwick Boseman, and Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall.  She’s the second black person nominated by a major party for national office. If she and Biden win, she’d become the first female vice president. 




The Biden Connection

A long-standing connection exists between Harris and the Biden family. In her campaign
memoir The Truths We Hold: An American Journey, Harris wrote glowingly  of her working relationship with Joe Biden’s now-deceased son, Beau, then attorney general of Delaware. While Harris held that position in California, they worked together on lawsuits against predatory mortgage lenders who precipitated the 2007 housing crisis. Harris called Beau Biden an “incredible friend and colleague” and “a man of principle and courage.” Joe Biden, in announcing he’d chosen Harris, alluded to his son’s high opinion of her.

Some thought her attack on Joe Biden in the first debate last summer might fray the relationship and keep him from picking her. She went after the former vice president over how he’d opposed busing in the 1970s. He demonstrated his political maturity by picking her anyway, noting recently that he doesn’t hold grudges.



The Politics

Much of the immediate discussion about Harris’s selection focused on what impact she might have on the race. Her graduation from
Howard and membership in the Alpha Kappa Alpha sorority and connection to  similar sororities offered the possibility of a massive mobilization of professional black women, the acknowledged backbone of the Democratic Party.  Some thought she might benefit from the “exotic factor” of Jamaican and Asian parentage, something akin to Barack Obama’s Africa-Kansas heritage. Others cautioned that Harris isn’t at the top of the ticket like Obama and the thrill of a person of color on a national ticket might be gone.


Calculating the impact of Harris’s prosecutorial background also occupied a lot
of attention. Some  progressives, especially African  American ones, regard  many prosecutors
with skepticism. Some give Harris credit for reforms while she headed the San Francisco district attorney’s office, but others don’t.





One certainty exists. Trump will try demonizing Harris. Right after Biden announced her selection, Trump labeled her “nasty” and “mean.” His campaign ran an ad claiming she’s a radical leftist who’d abolish police forces, raise taxes, and destroy the oil and gas industry. Some thought her selection, potentially putting her a heartbeat away from the presidency, will motivate Trump’s base to vote in larger numbers. 


Harris embodies many things Trump and his backers love hating – a woman, black, daughter of immigrants, progressive, and an
advocate of the rule of law. She faces the challenges women face in American politics. She must thread the needle between aggression and passivity, the classic cognitive dissonance dilemma.




The Bottom Line

In our May 11 post, we suggested Biden first focus on “what, not who” in the matter of a running mate. We noted the importance of picking someone “ready to play,” selecting a candidate compatible with him (we asked “Are they on the same page?”), and the need for choosing someone who could help heal a fractured, divided nation left in shambles by a historically inept president. We called that “Restorative Capacity.”


Despite the political analysis concerning the pick, we think Biden might have selected Harris because she best met the criteria we laid out. She had the most positives, given her combination of executive and legislative experience in government.  She also had the fewest negatives. Most of the things we can pick at her about are small or fixable.


Biden and whoever he picked, if they win, will have a huge job, much of it about things other than political ideology. The pandemic will likely remain with us when they take office.
They must dig the nation out of the economic hole the pandemic and Trump’s ineptitude indealing with it have caused. They have to restore respect for the rule of law and our basic institutions. They face a massive chore in reclaiming America’s standing in the world, beginning with repairing our alliances. Then there’s the racial divide the George Floyd case exposed. The list goes on.



We suspect Biden probably believes Christopher Devine and Kyle Kopko when
they said in their book Do Running Mates Matter that vice presidential candidates don’t yield many votes. But, given his own experience as Barack Obama’s wingman, Biden also knows they can make a big difference in governing. Maybe that’s why he picked Kamala Harris.