Monday, April 13, 2020

THE STRANGE CASE OF DONALD TRUMP AND THE DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT: A WAR TIME PRESIDENT WHO WON’T PULL OUT ALL THE STOPS TO WIN THE WAR


President Trump’s dance with the Defense Production Act of 1950 (DPA) makes us
wonder why he hasn’t embraced the DPA in getting
ventilators and other protective equipment in the hands of those battling the coronavirus. In a March 18 Executive Order, Trump declared ventilators and protective equipment
“essential to the national defense” against the
spread of the virus, the standard required by the DPA for production and distribution of critically needed equipment. The range of explanations spans a continuum from benign to cynical.  The
shortage of medical equipment compels a closer look at what’s happened.

The DPA gives a president broad powers that potentially could alleviate shortages. Trump doesn’t lack awareness of the law. He’s spoken, however, of “hopefully” not needing it against the virus and using it only in a “worst-case scenario.” The fact the nation now has more coronavirus cases than any other country sounds like a “worst-case scenario.”  





                     
Some History
The DPA’s roots rest in the Second World War. Congress gave President Franklin
Roosevelt broad authority for ordering that industry convert facilities and produce war material. When the Korean War started, President Harry Truman needed
Image Courtesy Wikimedia Commons
similar power. Congress enacted the DPA, a law that has been reauthorized over 50 times and has been regularly invoked since. Trump claimed the coronavirus pandemic makes him a “wartime president,” though, mysteriously, he’s not using all available resources for winning the war. 

The DPA gives presidents three kinds of power: (1) authority requiring that businesses accept and prioritize government contracts deemed necessary for national defense; (2) power for establishing regulations that allocate materials, services, and facilities for national defense; and (3) authority for managing the civilian economy assuring access to scarce materials for defense needs. Trump seemingly thinks the federal
government has only a limited role in the war since he declared the federal government isn’t a “shipping clerk.” Trump has acted as if each state is an independent nation, left to fend for itself. 
 
Trump, the Virus, and the DPA
essential supplies. None have shown enthusiasm at the prospect. Each, if ordered to produce essential supplies, could do so and, of course, would want a large share of the $2.2 trillion CARES bailout Congress passed and the president signed March 27.


The most visible company in the discussion, General Motors, could shift factories from building automobile engines to building ventilators. Trump’s order didn’t immediately require that GM convert to ventilator production.  GM, in fact, said it was going ahead with plans for manufacturing ventilators, but reportedly wanted $1 billion for doing so, millions of it upfront. A dispute over costs erupted between GM and the administration and discussions broke off. A bit later Trump said he’d use the DPA in requiring that General Motors accept and prioritize contracts for ventilators, the number being determined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services

Trump came under fire from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for his reluctance to use the
DPA. He finally, on April 2, said he was invoking the law and requiring that three companies – 3M, General Electric, and Medtronic – produce masks. Even GOP Senator Ted Cruz of Texas urged that Trump “exercise these delegated powers to the full extent necessary.  Trump, however, hasn’t ordered that General Motors,
or any of the other companies, begin production of other needed materials and has even gone so far as saying invoking the DPA would effectively “nationalize” firms. We find Trump’s reluctance about invoking the DPA baffling and he hasn’t explained his reasons.  Still, we have some ideas.


A Range of Possibilities
We start with the most benign potential reason. Imagining any president hesitating about injecting the government into the business of private companies isn’t difficult. Democrats and Republicans say they believe
in limited government. Staying out of a firm’s decisions about what it will produce, when, and at what price comports with that philosophy. Republican orthodoxy mandates that the government avoid intrusion into the operational life of private business as much as possible (tax cuts notwithstanding). We see this explanation near one end of a benign-to-cynical continuum.


Nearer the middle of that continuum, we
might suggest a political rationale. Perhaps, Trump fears antagonizing his political base if he strongly and enthusiastically uses the DPA. Many are true believers in Republican orthodoxy, despite their willingness to feed from the $2.2 trillion CARES trough. These supporters would likely regard any deviation from the party’s antigovernment norm as heresy, punishable in right wing media (and maybe at the ballot box). When Trump strayed a little from the line and sought a compromise with Democrats on his border wall, howls from Rush Limbaugh and Laura Ingraham forced his hand and he backed off the compromise idea.

On the far end of the continuum, Trump might just be appeasing friends in the industry. If he goes all-in with using the DPA in forcing production of large amounts of different materials, imagining that he will ruffle the feathers of friends in the manufacturing world follows. Could the president simply want protection for his captains-of-industry colleagues from costs associated with converting their operations to producing medical equipment? Is Trump putting the interests of his friends above what is best for the country right now?

It’s possible Trump’s reluctance springs from a combination of the factors we’ve identified and others. His real reasons could cover our
entire continuum. The mounting death toll and the need for addressing the health needs of millions of Americans, however, suggests using every tool in the box, including the DPA. 

Monday, April 6, 2020

MISSING SPORTS: THOUGHTS ON LOSING OUR GAMES


CORONAVIRUS DISRUPTS SPORTS


March is a big sports month in the United States. Except, this year, it wasn’t.  As the postseason swung into high gear, the plug got
pulled on college basketball because of the coronavirus. A few conference tournaments got played, a few others got started before cancellation, and the NCAA scrubbed March Madness altogether. The National Basketball Association shut down, as did Major League Baseball, college baseball, track and field, the golf tours, and virtually everything else. A few horse races have been run without fans, but that’s about it.
Horse race with no fans at Golden Gate Field
The NFL off-season, with news of trades, free agent signings, and draft preparation, continues unabated on the assumption, perhaps unfounded, the pro football season will happen this fall. College teams don’t know if they’ll have spring practices or even a season.

Sports on television? You can watch a “classic” game almost anytime and plenty of old ones that weren’t. ESPN repeats documentary programs on its various platforms and promotes a mythical, bracket-based popularity contest for determining the best college basketball player of all time.

As dedicated, life-long sports fans, each of us reacts to the loss of live and televised sports in his own way:

Woodson: Sports is Out of Season
“To everything there is a season, and a time for every purpose under the heaven.”
Ecclesiastes 3:1-8
The coronavirus pandemic has quelled my interest in sports. In high school, I loved
playing basketball
, fall through spring. I found
each sport a welcome relief from rigorous farm work. My high school ended its football program my sophomore year, so I didn't take an interest in football until college. By then, I was engrossed in student government, making sports secondary.
 
My appetite for college basketball developed while I attended law school at the University of Minnesota 1971-74. Minnesota had a national championship-caliber basketball
team with athletes like
Dave Winfield, who went on to a Hall of Fame Major League Baseball career with the New York Yankees and five other teams. The Golden Gophers provided me with a needed emotional outlet, given the rigors of law school.
Between 1990 and 2006 I was involved in
WBA ArchAngels
basketball as an
AAU sponsor, coach, and owner of a semi-pro team. I enjoyed the comradery, travel, coaching, and learning the intricacies of basketball.

So, sports have played a prominent role in my life. Right now, though, not being able to watch them because of the pandemic engenders no sense of loss.

I have sons, daughters, and grandchildren in
New York, New Jersey, and Maryland – ground zero states in the pandemic. I now focus on them, and others similarly situated. Sports may become a priority again later. Now is not that season.   


Henry:  Missing the Competition
For me, it’s the love of sports competition. I
start with this declaration because it’s personal. As a child, I somehow internalized the notion that, because of a foot problem, doctors predicted I could never wear tennis shoes or effectively compete in sports.
Whether my doctors actually made such a stark pronouncement, I used my interpretation as motivation for competing, despite significant foot pain.

In some ways, this behavior is strange. Because of what my parents taught me, I have almost always done my best in whatever I attempted. Sports, however, seem different. I don’t feel the same competitive urge in other
parts of my life. As a senior in high school, for example, I ignored academic and citizenship honors. My only goal was representing our baseball team by accepting the state championship trophy we’d won. I don’t remember the academic awards I received.  Perhaps I found proving something to MYSELF necessary in no other arena.

With that background, my love of sports grew beyond participation. I came to love watching sports competitions. I watched my sons play
soccer, baseball, and basketball. I’ve watched, and still watch, my grandkids play many sports. During my working years, I enjoyed at least
limited baseball, football, and basketball
television watching. In retirement, my viewing time increased dramatically. I’ve added golf, tennis, and other sports I won’t mention.
I miss the competition. 
 
Rob: It’s the Intensity, stupid!
With all I have going on, I’ve limited my sports fandom some in the last few years. Once upon a time, I couldn’t miss any game or golf or tennis tournament. Starting in the early part of the 2010s, however, I focused on a few
things – college football, women’s college basketball, and golf. I kept an eye on Major League Baseball and the NFL while assuming casual fan status toward former passions
track and field, tennis, and the NBA. I watched and read about their major events like the
Olympics and World Championships, the tennis majors, and the NBA playoffs, but I didn’t obsess about them day-to-day.  Now, I even miss that.
 
All this, I suppose, could produce deep
philosophical questions about why I find sports so important as I work at keeping my law practice going and transitioning into a writing career. Couldn’t I do without sports? Now that we’re all without them, isn’t this a good time for chunking them?
No. I miss the intensity that goes with high-level sports competition, whether live or televised. Life isn’t as much fun without the tension and struggle accompanying the battle
in a college basketball game or the final holes of a PGA tournament. Despite practical reasons for just going on with life, I’m having a hard time without that regular intensity. I can’t even yell at officials. Everybody who knows me knows I must do that.