Wednesday, August 8, 2018

STACEY ABRAMS AND THE GEORGIA GOVERNOR’S RACE: A Black Woman Takes Aim at the Peach State’s Top Prize



While the U.S. House of Representatives races, and the Democratic attempt at flipping the necessary 23 seats for a majority may determine the nation’s immediate political future, the race for Governor of Georgia might say much more about the long-term state of our politics than any other contest this fall. 


The importance of the race lies not just in the possibility former Georgia House Minority Leader Stacey Yvonne Abrams could become the nation’s first black woman governor.  That’s significant, no doubt, but if she defeats her Republican opponent, Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp, the way she wins could mean a lot more than a race and gender breakthrough.  




A Different Southern Democrat 
Abrams, who’s on the August 6/August 13 , 2018 cover of Time, won Georgia’s Democratic gubernatorial nomination with a decidedly different approach from Democrats in the South since the GOP’s dominance of the region took hold in the 80s and 90s.  Abrams defeated another former Georgia state representative, Stacey Evans, 3-to-1, with a decidedly progressive message and campaign strategy.  Rather than running to the center, Abrams aimed both her message (public education, prison reform, gun safety, health care, liberal positions on abortion and gay rights, expanded public transportation) and her campaign resources at blacks, Georgia’s growing Hispanic population, and young, progressive white voters.  Abrams and her team think they can win the general election with a finely tuned organization that turns out that coalition.



Abrams’s approach depends heavily on an expensive, well-run ground game. Even political novices know much of the electorate Abrams needs often skips mid-term elections.  Democrats got creamed in 2010 and 2014 during the Obama era because the young, progressive, and minority group voters who propelled the election and re-election of the nation’s first black president stayed home in those mid-term years. Abrams thinks she can turn out those voters and make up the 200,000 votes by which centrist Democratic candidates like Michelle Nunn, the daughter of former U.S. Senator Sam Nunn, and Jason Carter, the grandson of former President Jimmy Carter, lost in statewide races in recent years. 


The last two presidential results, and the state’s changing demographics, give Abrams hope.  Trump beat Hillary Clinton in Georgia by only five points and Barak Obama lost to Romney by seven and a half.  The Atlanta suburbs, teeming with increasing numbers of voters of color and liberal whites who’ve moved in from other states, give Abrams a solid base.  To win, many analysts think, in addition to getting 90 % or more of the black vote, she must execute her get-out-the-vote plan well enough to make 40% of the total vote non-white, roughly the percentage of Georgia’s non-white voting age population.  She also must get about 25% of the white vote, considered doable if she can turn out those liberals in the Atlanta suburbs.



Baggage 
Abrams presents as something of a Renaissance woman.  In addition to her political career, she’s worked as a tax lawyer, run several businesses, and written novels under the pen name Selena Montgomery.  She hails from a two parent home in which her mother, father, and two siblings earned college degrees, though one brother served prison time.  Some contend this family background gives her credibility with middle class and under class voters.  Her time in the Georgia legislature suggests a capacity to work both sides of the aisle.


Abrams isn’t perfect though, and Republicans are already going after her flaws.  Aside from the “D” behind her name in a state that hasn’t elected a Democratic governor in two decades, vulnerabilities in her personal story provide fertile ground for attack ads.  She’s admitted owing the IRS $50,000 in back taxes and having $170,000 in credit card and student loan debt (Abrams holds degrees from historically black Spelman College, the Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, and Yale Law School).  She says much of the debt accumulated because of help she gave her parents after college, but critics still think they can exploit her personal financial situation.



The Election   
Some early polls show Abrams even or ahead in her race with Kemp, a Trump-endorsed right winger who, in his runoff contest with Lt. Governor Casey Cagle, talked more about standing for the national anthem, guns, and immigration, than about Georgia policy issues.  All indications point to a close race, though Kemp stands as the favorite in most quarters.  Abrams will have a well-funded campaign, thanks both to her network of small donors and contributions from progressives across the country. Abrams knows grassroots organizing and her opponents will not outwork her. The race, shaping up as one of this year’s most expensive political contests, might tell us more about the nation than any other campaign this cycle.



Source:  realclearpolitics.com 





We’re keeping a close eye on this race, not just because of the historic possibility of seeing an African-American woman ascend to the governorship of a southern state.  The Abrams strategy holds enormous potential for progressive electoral causes in the United States.  Abrams thinks she can win with a coalition of progressive whites and people of color.  As with Doug Jones in last year’s Alabama Senate race, she hopes for a big turnout of black women.  If Stacey Abrams pulls this off, she will have written the playbook for putting Democrats in power at the Presidential, Congressional, and statehouse levels.      

Monday, July 30, 2018

TRUMP: TREASON? A CALL TO ACTION



The Responsibility of Patriots: Impeach, Vote Democrat in Mid-term, Take our country back!

We wrote recently about former State Secretary Madeleine Albright’s warning that facist rumblings around the world
threaten democracy.  We didn’t hesitate, and neither did the Secretary in her book Fascism: A Warning, to include President Donald Trump among those about whom we should have such concerns.  Things have only gotten worse since we shared the publication.  More reasons than ever exist for believing Trump existentially threatens democratic institutions in this country and the alliances the United States helped fashion that have kept the western democracies safe in the 70 plus years since the Second World War.

 
We need not detail Trump’s disgraceful performance in Helsinkiafter his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.  Others have said plenty.  As American patriots, the three of us view Trump’s actions there as beyond the pale.  We’ve seen enough to declare Trump a Kleptocrat, if not an outright fascist.  His behavior calls for a response from all responsible Americans.




CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER

As lawyers, we know the dangers of hyperbole.  Lots of people say Trump represents a danger to democracy.  They point to his race baiting after Charlottesville, his disgraceful practice of separating infants and children from their parents at the border as part of a cruel immigration policy, his attacks on the Muslim religion, and his war on the media, Fox News exempted.  What’s different now is Trump’s willingness to bow to a foreign adversary while
disparaging and fighting with our allies – the countries that have stood with us and behind us throughout the post-war era.  No American should forget European members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) came to our aid after September 11, 2001.


Yet, before he went to Finland and groveled next to Putin, there was Trump picking fights with Germany, Great Britain, and other NATO members.  He even audaciously labeled the European Union our “foe.”  Trump behaves as if he’d prefer helping Putin dissolve NATO, leaving the Russian President free to annex Eastern European states and perhaps even reconstitute the old Soviet Union, no doubt a goal of this ruthless ex-KGB agent.  Even if Putin can’t accomplish that, Trump has already helped him diminish the influence of the United States.  Some European countries say they can no longer depend on American leadership.


A TIME FOR ACTION: WHAT TO DO

As we’ve pointed out before in our blogs, the three of us don’t speak with one voice on many issues.  We are different people who, from time to time, express a variety of political positions and preferences.  Yes, we’re mostly Democrats, but we’re not the same kind of Democrat, and we don’t see every issue in partisan terms.  We think of ourselves as patriots and though we each live our patriotism differently, we put country before party.


Having said that, we acknowledge seeing only a partisan solution to the danger Donald Trump’s behavior poses to the country we love.  Ironically enough, in this circumstance, we take our cues from several Republicans.


Steve Schmidt ran John McCain’s 2008 Presidential campaign.  Schmidt has been,throughout his political career
a dedicated adherent to the Republican Party and the conservative movement.  He worked for George W. Bush and helped put two conservative justices on the U.S. Supreme Court. Schmidt now, however, advocates a vote for Democratic candidates in this fall’s mid-term elections as the only way to undo the grave damage he sees Trump doing to America.  Schmidt, at least for the moment, has withdrawn from the Republican Party and sees voting Democratic as the proper response to Trump’s behavior.  Columnist George F. Will, another prominent Republican voice of long standing influence, echoed similar sentiments, urging independents and non-Trump Republicans to vote in a way that will “substantially reduce” the size of the Republican caucus in Congress.


Schmidt and Will see the same thing we do.  Democratic control of the House would open the possibility – even the probability – of impeachment proceedings against Trump.  We wrote about the mechanisms of impeachment in June 2017, noting that process can’t start without Democrats holding the levers of power.


Even if Congress doesn’t remove Trump from office (imagining the two-thirds vote in the Senate required for conviction remains difficult), an impeachment inquiry could reign in Trump’s behavior.  Because House Republicans have stood so strongly behind him, his behavior has gone unchecked.  Democrats who oppose him in Congress sometimes seem like they’re howling in the wind.  Trump hasn’t had to respond to subpoenas, release tax returns, or answer for financial and policy excesses.  With Democrats in control of even one house of Congress, things will change.  That howling may soon resemble a pack of hungry wolves on the trail of a wounded animal.


We think it possible, in fact, Special Counsel Robert Mueller already has much of his case against Trump made.  Mueller, a smart Washington operative, knows putting out his report now, with Republicans remaining in control of the House where impeachment must begin, means that report would 
likely get relegated to the trash can.  If Mueller believes he can’t indict a sitting President, making impeachment the only remedy for Trump’s crimes, Mueller may well have decided he’ll wait and present his report to a more receptive audience.  We can’t imagine a more receptive audience than a Democratic majority in the House of Representatives.  That’s our dream and Trump’s worst nightmare.  


That’s what we think. Tell us what you think.