Showing posts with label Colin Kaepernick. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Colin Kaepernick. Show all posts

Monday, June 15, 2020

GEORGE FLOYD, DREW BREES, TEACHING, AND READING ASSIGNMENTS: THE EDUCATION OF WHITE AMERICA ABOUT RACE



George Floyd’s family buried him June 9 after
services in Minneapolis, North Carolina, and Houston. The trauma his murder caused his family, African Americans generally, and many whites continues. Since we can’t discuss all the things that surfaced from the Floyd case, we’ve picked one we think urgent and interesting: talk between African Americans and whites about race.
The three of us see value in African Americans engaging whites on race. Some African Americans think that’s a waste of time, offering some version of, “Educating white people about race isn’t our responsibility. They should figure it out for themselves.” Those arguing that note it’s been tried for years with disappointing results. We understand the underlying frustration, but we hold a different view.

Drew Brees: Tone Deaf
We can’t find a better example of why we think engaging white Americans on race makes sense than the case of New Orleans Saints quarterback Drew Brees. After Floyd’s death, Brees clung to the familiar talking point that he could “never agree with anyone disrespecting” the flag when asked about his feelings now on former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick and kneeling during the national anthem. Because Brees counts as a “good guy,” his comments showing he didn’t get it felt worse than had they come from a source known for insensitivity. His community service record in predominately black New Orleans suggested he understood better than many white NFL players the need for recognizing the impact of racism on African Americans. He led Katrina recovery efforts, donated millions for feeding the hungry during the pandemic, and helped rebuild parks and playgrounds.

Black NFL players, including his Saints teammates, pushed back. They said Kaepernick’s protest had nothing to do with the flag or the military, which Brees referenced in mentioning the Second World War service of his grandfathers. San Francisco defensive back Richard Sherman tweeted, “He’s beyond lost. Guarantee you there were black men fighting alongside your grandfather, but this doesn’t seem to be about that. That uncomfortable conversation you are trying to avoid by injecting military into conversation about brutality and equality is part of the problem.”
Brees apologized, saying he was “sick about the way my comments were perceived,” and
that his “insensitive” statements “completely missed the mark on the issues we are facing now as a country.” San Francisco Chronicle columnist Ann Killion wrote that his apology “felt late…Four years late.”

It Is About Race
The Brees story illustrates how even well-intentioned white people convert discussions
of racial animus into discussions about something else. “This isn’t about race” we’ve heard  often. As sociologist Robin DiAngelo writes in  White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism, “Most white people have limited information about what racism is and how it works. For many white people, an isolated course taken in college or required … in their workplace is the only time they may
encounter a direct and sustained challenge to their racial reality.” That reality includes the fact that, according to a Public Religion Research Institute study, 75 % of white Americans have entirely white social networks. If Drew Brees, who plays in a league that’s about 70% black, has trouble understanding why kneeling concerned brutality and inequality, not the flag and the military, what about those in the 75%?          
We believe the Floyd case and the angst it produced are about race. The protests are
about the disparity in police treatment of African Americans and whites. The Floyd case and the protests are about the fact every African American faces a greater risk of being the victim of police assault than does a white person, regardless of education, socioeconomic standing, or zip code. It is about race.

Class Assignments
White people often ask what they should do to better understand racism. We believe
African Americans should keep talking with whites about the challenges of living in America as descendants of enslaved people. We would not leave our white brothers and sisters to their own
devices and conversations among themselves about the nature of that experience. We recall from the Bible (the word of God for some, wisdom literature for others, and meaningless fable for others) Matthew 15:14, which says “… and if the blind
lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.” As distressing as some may find it, we must say that when it comes to racism, many white Americans are blind.

Still, the responsibility for whites learning about the effects of racism doesn’t fall solely on African Americans. Recently  on his church’s call-in forum, Woodson noted the importance of studying the history of this problem. That’s part of anti-racism work. With this topic, ignorance is not  bliss. Woodson suggested our three favorite books on race – Isabel Wilkerson’s The Warmth of Other
Suns, The Color of Law by Richard Rothstein, and Edward Baptist’s The Half Has Never Been Told. Henry adds Ralph Ellison’s great novel, Invisible Man. We understand the tough sledding these books sometimes require, so we also offer works that present the issue in more digestible form:
·Racing Across the Lines: Changing Race Relations Through Friendship by Deborah Plummer;
·Me and White Supremacy: Combat Racism, Change the World, and Become a Good Ancestor by Layla F. Saad;
·So You Want to Talk About Race by Ijeoma Oluo; and
·How to be an Antiracist by Ibram X. Kendi.
At least one of us has read all these titles and believes each teaches something about how African Americans and whites can talk concerning race and about white intra-race talk, something we see as valuable. None pull
punches. Some readers may find parts of them disturbing. We think that’s necessary, seeing virtue in the old saw about comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable. What we've been doing certainly hasn’t worked.      

Thursday, August 16, 2018

STANDING OR KNEELING FOR THE NATIONAL ANTHEM: WHO’S A REAL PATRIOT?



Football season is upon us!  We’re ready to enjoy the nation’s most compelling sport, right?  As college football analyst Lee Corso might say, however, ‘not so fast.’  In addition to chattering about blitz packages and pass patterns, players, fans, and media once again find the sport embroiled in the now-racialized criminal justice/national

We feel compelled to discuss this topic because the issues underlying the debate symbolize important concerns in America’s political and legal fabric.  Earlier, on a different issue, we proudly called ourselves patriots because of our commitment to protecting this country’s democratic institutions and principles.  Those institutions and principles assure rights and opportunities for all Americans.  The criminal justice/national anthem debate implicates critical American values, so we will have our say.

The Kneeling, Blackballed Quarterback
In 2016, San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick,
a biracial American, began kneeling during the national
anthem in protest of racial injustice in the United States, including police shootings of young black men.  Kaepernick’s entire story is complex and we won’t detail it here.  Suffice it to say kneeling eventually helped get him blackballed and he hasn’t played since late 2016. Because no team would sign him, Kaepernick filed a lawsuit against the NFL.


Other players, nearly all African-American, began kneeling.  That was controversial,
of course, but when Trump slammed them at an Alabama political rally in 2017, he exposed other racial wounds in American society.  The image-obsessed NFL and its mostly Trump-friendly owners got nervous and began taking actions that would curb the protests.  The league at one time offered players financial support for community projects in exchange for ending the protests.  During this past off-season, the league formulated a rule requiring players to stand for the anthem or remain in the locker room while it’s played.  Some teams, however, said they’ll fine players if they don’t go onto the field and stand for the anthem, negating the league-mandated locker room option.

Free Speech?

Protesting players and their supporters often cast this as a free speech issue. It is and it isn’t.  As lawyers,we certainly
know the First Amendment to the United States Constitution  likely doesn’t apply in this circumstance.  The First Amendment operates as a limit on government, not as a general,
across-the-board grant of personal free speech rights applicable in all situations.  The NFL isn't the government.  No court, at least not on First Amendment grounds, can keep the NFL from enforcing whatever speech limits it wants on its players in the absence of a collective bargaining agreement addressing the issue. 

That legal principle doesn’t, however, end the inquiry. We’d note the NFL’s extensive entanglement with government, potentially suggesting a court should treat it as a state actor for free speech purposes.  Nearly every NFL team plays in a stadium built, at least in part, with tax dollars.  Extensive police presence at league games gives them the flavor of state-sponsored events.   The NFL’s close ties with the U.S. military only add to the connection between the league and the federal government.

Leaving aside this admittedly novel legal argument, the NFL has become so pervasive in our society that squashing a player’s ability to comment, symbolically, on an important political and social issue seems outdated, outmoded, and fundamentally unfair.  Entertainers, political figures, and business people engage in protected, symbolic speech all the time.  What makes professional athletes different?  The fact not many players in other leagues haven’t protested in the same way doesn’t really answer that question.

Zero Sum Game?
While the protests started as an effort to bring attention to race discrimination in the criminal justice system, almost single handedly, Trump turned them into a debate about who is patriotic and who isn’t.   Stand for the anthem and you’re a patriot, kneel and you’re not.  We should not forget our history.  Throughout the life of this nation groups of all kinds – blacks, women, religious minorities, the LBGTQ community -- have taken the route of peaceful, non-violent protest in securing rights majorities take for granted.  Protest has made our nation stronger.

During the Vietnam era, war protesters regularly wrapped the flag around their dissent.  They argued the best way to honor America, its traditions, and its institutions was ending our disgusting involvement in an immoral war that ultimately didn’t serve the national interest or enhance national security.  While the Johnson and Nixon administrations equated patriotism with support for the war, dissenters declared themselves the real patriots.

We see a parallel between Vietnam and the national anthem debate of today.  Maintaining the right to bring grievances against the government stands at the core of our democracy.  This nation rests on that foundation.  The fact the NFL technically isn’t the government doesn’t matter.  The NFL is such a big player in American life, if protests at NFL games represent the best way to challenge unjust police shootings, we should have protests at NFL games.  If players can’t protest at NFL games now, in the future, where else will some fascist-leaning leader say we can’t have protests?   

Think about that.