If you watch much cable news, you often
hear the question posed to guests appearing about
the George Floyd case and the ensuing demonstrations, “Is
this different?” The question recognizes that there’ve been protests before
about police misconduct and racial injustice, but many argue things didn’t
significantly change. The hosts
ask if the length of time the protests have
continued and the diversity of the crowds means something might happen this
time that hasn’t happened in recent history.
We believe the “Is this different
question?” suggests a number of answers, depending on
how the questioner
defines “different.” If the question speaks to short term
reform of police practices, that might warrant one answer. If the question
refers to long term, systemic change regarding race relations,
income and
wealth inequality, and universal medical care for all Americans a much
different answer seems in order. Today, we wade into the question of policing.
A partisan divide: What did you expect?
put out police reform proposals
and might
vote on them soon in the houses of Congress they control. Some reports say House Speaker Nancy
Pelosi already has the votes for
a legislative package spearheaded by the Congressional Black Caucus. The measures would:
and Jim
Lankford of Oklahoma, put out
their plan. Its highlights include:
Republicans aren’t sure if
they’d ever accept
codification of a use-of-force standard, like a chokehold ban. Overall, the Republican plan focuses on record
keeping and transparency, while Democrats prefer specific limits on police
conduct. Representatives of both sides offered early conciliatory talk about
the possibility of compromise and suggested patience during the legislative
process. That’s admirable. The question of getting the gap bridged remains.
The absence of prohibitions against chokeholds
and no-knock warrants in the Republican proposal stand out. Qualified
immunity reform might become the biggest sticking point. Some Republicans
called that Democratic proposal a “poison pill,” something Republicans could
never accept. Scott said any “poison pill” in the legislation means getting
nothing.
Waiting
for the Election
We don’t doubt members of Congress have an obligation
to try getting something done now. Things keep happening. With George Floyd barely buried, another high-profile case developed in
Atlanta, where a white police officer killed another black man, Rayshard Brooks, by shooting him in the
back as he
fled after a scuffle with officers. The optics in the Brooks case were
different than what happened to Floyd in Minneapolis, but the bottom line
remained the same – a police officer used deadly force when reasonable
alternatives existed. Experienced law enforcement observers said no reason
existed for shooting Brooks. He wasn’t armed with a deadly weapon and wasn’t
likely to get away or harm anyone else since police had his driver’s license
and vehicle.
The Brooks case and the continuing protests highlighted the need for action but the truth remains that with Donald Trump in the White House and Republicans in
control of the U.S. Senate, passing the kind of bill Democrats want just may
not happen this year. That puts them to a choice – accept something like what
the Republicans now propose or wait things out until the election in the hope
of getting a senate majority and winning the presidency. Then, Democrats could
pass their version of police reform legislation.
The
Long Run
Whatever happens with police reform measures, the
debate about race and whether this moment is “different” will continue. Whether or not this is “different” depends on changes
in the heads and hearts of Americans and in the structure of institutions. How
different it becomes depends first on individual decisions
Americans of all races make about their own attitudes and behaviors concerning
racial issues. Do white people finally recognize the role white supremacy has
played in American society and decide they will help eradicate its effects? Will
people of color embrace the idea of equality is within reach? How “different”
this time becomes also depends on public policy decisions political leaders,
businesses, and institutions make in the weeks, months, and years ahead in
response to the protests.
The debate over police reform constitutes a significant
part of our current racial angst, but it’s not all the problem. As the
developing controversies over income and wealth inequality, the lack of
universal health care
coverage, names of military bases and monuments in cities
and on college campuses, even university alma maters, make
clear, this is a multi-faceted problem and we have miles to go before we sleep.
I read and re-read this and read many other writings relative to the loss of life of George Floyd. This story correlates with so many others however it hit home as it most definitely ran parallel to an incident that transpired in Arkansas to a 24 year old young man - Carnell Russ.
ReplyDeleteSmall amount of money. Encounter with law enforcement. Death of a unarmed, black man.
https://encyclopediaofarkansas.net/entries/carnell-russ-8251/