year-old document had at its inception and, for that matter, still has, the nation got a tutorial in what’s
right about it. Americans could say at week’s end maybe things haven’t gone to
hell in a handbasket after all. Maybe
the system of checks and balances works.
State
Department official George Kent,
the
current U.S.
Ambassador to Ukraine
William
Taylor, and former Ambassador to Ukraine Marie
Yovanovitch told much the same story in their
riveting testimony. Trump held up U.S. military aid in an attempt to bribe Ukraine's president into announcing an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and a discredited conspiracy theory that Ukraine, not Russia, interfered in the 2016
election. Only the most partisan Trump backers now contend
the President didn’t engage in attempted bribery.
Kent, Taylor, and Yovanovitch preparing to testify at Trump impeachment hearing |
The
Scene
When Chairman
Adam
Schiff (D-Cal) convened the hearings Wednesday, the
impeachment inquiry moved into a new phase. Committee members knew what the
witnesses would say because those witnesses had given sworn testimony in closed-door
depositions. Now, it was showtime, so the American people could see what the
investigators had found.
The
hearings aimed at the key audiences in this saga. A vote in the House
impeaching Trump
now seems a foregone conclusion. Whether he stays or goes, therefore, depends
on potentially persuadable Republican senators who might support ousting Trump
and swing voters (the 15-25% of the country that doesn’t have its mind made up)
whose support for conviction might produce those Republican
votes in the Senate.
The
Witnesses
government service in
administrations headed by both Democrats and Republicans demonstrated personal
appeal and exhaustive knowledge of the subject at issue and of their Ukraine
jobs. Both challenged Trump's credibility in
ways
that arguably overcame the inherent power of his office. Both eschewed
politics, making Republicans look small in trying to paint them as partisan
hacks.
It was Yovanovitch who, thanks in
part to an insane blunder by Trump, ended the first round of hearings as a star. When she left the hearing room Friday after, the crowd
erupted in spontaneous applause, sending chills down the
spines of Americans across the nation. During her testimony, Trump attacked
Yovanovitch
in a mean-spirited Tweet, blaming her for unrest in Somalia, one of
the early stops in her 33-year career as a foreign service officer. Schiff read
her the Tweet and she acknowledged she found it “very intimidating.”
Schiff
told her some members of Congress "take witness intimidation very, very seriously," a hint an
article
of impeachment might well include that charge. Commentators
and legal observers noted that a specific provision of the United States Code
forbids witness intimidation. Not long after
Trump’s Tweet, a federal jury convicted long time Trump associate Roger Stone of witness tampering and six other felonies carrying a potential prison sentence totaling fifty years.
Trump’s Tweet, a federal jury convicted long time Trump associate Roger Stone of witness tampering and six other felonies carrying a potential prison sentence totaling fifty years.
If
the testimony of Kent, Taylor, and Yovanovitch wasn’t enough, a development late Friday made things even worse
for Trump and his allies. When Taylor testified Wednesday, he revealed he’d just
learned that a member of his embassy staff overheard Trump on a phone call with
U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon
Sondland talking about seeking an investigation into Biden
and the 2016 election allegations.
Taylor hadn’t known of the call when he gave his deposition.
The staff member
surfaced Friday night, appearing for his own deposition and offering an opening
statement describing the call he overheard. David Holmes’s
account of the call torpedoed one Republican defense – that witnesses like
Taylor, Kent, and Yovanovitch had only provided “hearsay,” since they hadn’t
actually heard Trump seeking the investigations.
The
Genius of Our Constitution
We will in the future
say more about the meaning of the constitution and its role in this impeachment
exercise. Suffice it to say now that what we've seen demonstrates the hope and the cynicism embedded in the document. Donald Trump is being held to account because the framers set up a
system that recognized the difficulty in dealing with a corrupt, lawless
leader. The past week demonstrates that as perhaps never before.
The
hope in the constitution lies in the fact it contains the tools for dealing
with someone like Trump. Congress checks the executive
branch through institutional mechanisms like the power of
the purse, the oversight function, and, ultimately, impeachment. Though Trump
has tried frustrating the process by preventing his lieutenants from
testifying, career public servants in the executive branch
like Kent,
Taylor and Yovanovitch defied him and testified anyway. The framers no doubt understood personal courage would come into play a some point. If Trump wins re-election, we wonder if he will push these brave men and women out of public service and replace them with enablers willing to do his bidding.
There is more. Bad
actors sometimes require a cynical approach, meaning the courts and criminal
prosecution have their roles, as the Roger Stone verdict demonstrates. Where would the Watergate-based
impeachment of Richard
Nixon have been without the U.S. Supreme Court’s
unanimous ruling in the Nixon v. United States
tapes case?
Our
constitution wasn’t and isn’t perfect. This isn't the place for expounding on the
evil of the three-fifths compromise and other flaws. We can get to them later. This is the place, however, for pointing out that what
we saw last week shows why this nation has survived as long as it has and maybe why we’ll survive the calamity of the Trump presidency.
we saw last week shows why this nation has survived as long as it has and maybe why we’ll survive the calamity of the Trump presidency.
No comments:
Post a Comment