WILL AMERICA FINALLY PUT A WOMAN IN THE WHITE
HOUSE?
The United States has never elected a
woman president or
vice president.That fact stands out as the 2020 campaign
gets going. If a “Madam President,” or even a “Madam Vice President,” raises
her right hand on the U.S. Capitol steps on January 20, 2021, the country will
have made significant history. Whether the nation elects a female president or
vice president represents a major part of the 2020 campaign story, especially
since so many women are running for president this time.
0 for 3
The two major American political parties have nominated three
women for the nation’s two top political jobs. All three lost. But, there is a
story with each one that makes saying the country won’t elect a woman unfair
and probably not accurate. Each lost for a variety of reasons, some having to
do with sex and some having to do with other things.
New York Congresswoman Geraldine Ferraro became the
first woman on a major party ticket in
1984 when Walter Mondale picked her as his running mate. Some
thought Mondale, trailing badly in the polls, needed a jumpstart for his
campaign against Ronald Reagan and picking a woman vice
presidential candidate might give him that. It didn’t. Mondale and Ferraro lost
in a 49 state landslide, meaning Mondale probably was doomed in the first place
and no running mate would have made a difference.
John McCain selected Alaska Governor Sarah Palin for his 2008 race against Barack Obama. Palin gave McCain a brief boost in the polls, but that
faded fast as Palin’s woeful lack of preparation for national office became
painfully clear. McCain and his close aides later confessed they regretted the
choice.
Palin/Mcain |
Democrats nominated Hillary Clinton for president in 2016 and polls suggested she’d win,
shattering the glass ceiling.
Speculating about why she lost has become a cottage industry. She, and others, have blamed her loss, at least in
part, on sexism. No one should deny sexism played a role in Clinton’s defeat,
but blaming it all on sexism isn’t accurate or fair. Too many other things,
including FBI Director Jim Comey, the Russians, Clinton’s own baggage, and the strange nature of Donald Trump’s appeal, figured into the 2016 outcome to say Clinton lost
because of her gender.
Sex and the 2020
Campaign
As of this writing, six women have announced their
candidacies for the 2020 Democratic nomination. One of them, spiritualist author Marianne Williamson, who’s never held public office and
lost a congressional race as an independent in 2014, seems the longest of long
shots. Another, Hawaii Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, starts out in the bottom tier of a very crowded field and
would become a factor only with a huge upset in an early caucus or primary. But
four others, all U.S. Senators, can make a credible case for becoming the
Democratic nominee:
- Kirstin Gillibrand of Ne w York
- Kamala Harris of California
- Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota
- Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts
All have strengths and weaknesses the 2020 campaign will
expose and exacerbate, leaving sex aside. But will the sheer fact of gender
derail an otherwise winning campaign?
The available evidence doesn’t answer
the question. Polls
taken between 2012 and last year show about five per cent of voters,
on average, say they absolutely won’t vote for a woman for president. Slightly
fewer said they wouldn’t vote for a black person (atheism remains the biggest
taboo in American politics, with 43% saying in 2012 they wouldn’t vote for an
atheist, though that dropped to 40% by 2015). The meaning of such polls remains
unclear since pollsters ask the questions in the abstract. The right person and
an appealing set of issue positions might overcome gender, racial, or religious
bias.
The history doesn’t answer the question
either because of the unique circumstances under which each female vice
presidential or presidential nominee ran. Democrats have proven they will
nominate a woman for president; that glass ceiling has been shattered. This
time, if a woman gets the presidential nomination or accepts the vice
presidency, unlike Ferraro, they won’t face a candidate on the other side
anywhere near as popular as Reagan. All the women now holding office, meaning
Gabbard, Gillibrand, Harris, Klobuchar, and Warren, seem infinitely better
prepared than Palin. At least at the moment, none are as disliked as Clinton.
In short, all seemingly have better prospects than their predecessors on this
journey.
The Rest of the World
Many nations to which we compare
ourselves have long
since crossed the threshold of selecting a female leader. Angela Merkel, maybe the real leader of the Free World, has been German Chancellor since 2005. Theresa May serves as the United Kingdom’s second woman Prime Minister. Women have led India (Indira Gandhi) and Israel (Golda
Meir).
Only the 2020 primary and general election campaigns will determine whether the United States joins
its world counterparts and finally elects a woman to one of its two highest
offices. In the post-World War II era, becoming vice president has often been
the ticket to the oval office (see, e.g., Harry Truman, Richard Nixon, Lyndon
Johnson, Gerald Ford, George H.W. Bush), so even the election of a woman as
vice president would represent a major milestone. In 2020, America can catch up
with much of the rest of the western world. It’s about time.
No comments:
Post a Comment