Monday, January 13, 2020

GUNBATTLES IN CHURCH: AN AMERICAN PLAGUE


All three of us grew up attending church regularly and we still do. In our early lives, we never, ever worried about our personal
safety while in church. How things have changed. Attacks on worshippers at a Church of Christ in White Settlement, Texas near Ft. Worth and  at a Hanukkah celebration at a rabbi’s home in Monsey, New York just before the end of 2019  illustrated the vulnerability of all kinds of faith communities. The situation has gotten bad
enough
that last summer the Federal Bureau of Investigation invited religious leaders from across the country to a meeting in Washington on how houses of worship can protect congregants from violent attack. 

A Brutal, Hateful HistoryiHHi
Overwhelmingly, church shootings appear motivated by hate of members of the religious group attacked:

*In 2015, acknowledged white supremacist Dylan Roof killed nine black congregants engaged in bible study at the “Mother”  Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, South Carolina. Roof, who’s been sentenced to death, posted racist statements on line before he acted.
*In May 2019, a Nashville, Tennessee jury convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment 27-year old Emanuel Samson after he shot and killed one person and wounded seven others at a Church of Christ in Antioch, Tennessee. Prosecutors asserted Samson acted in retaliation for the Charleston massacre. 
*Six people died in an attack on a Sikh temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin on August 5, 2012, by a U.S. Army veteran who’d immersed himself in the white power music scene in North Carolina.
*As early as July 2008, an unemployed truck driver named Jim David Adkisson shot and killed two people and wounded six others at the Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church in Knoxville. Authorities found a manifesto in Adkisson’s car expressing his hatred for liberals, Democrats, blacks, and gays.
Motives for some church shootings have remained murky, such as in the killing of 26 people at a Baptist church in Sulphur Springs, Texas in November 2017. The investigation into the White Settlement, Texas incident remains open and the motive, if known to authorities, hasn’t been disclosed.
How Much Security?
Religious leaders, in light of this ghastly
history, now face questions about how they secure their places of worship without turning them into fortresses. The White Settlement Church, ten years ago, formed a security team made up of trained, armed volunteers. Church leaders there credited the security team with saving “a lot of lives” when they noticed the gunman “acting suspiciously” and shot him during a gun battle that erupted just before communion. Two members of that security team died in the attack.

Some congregations employ uniformed security officers who patrol the premises during services, looking for people who seem out of place or are, as in the case of the White Settlement attack, “acting suspiciously.”  Some houses of worship, though not all, arm these officers. The presence of uniformed officers certainly could deter potential attacks. If a shooter opens fire and the officers are not armed, however, an outcome like that in White Settlement with a limited loss of life, might not materialize.
  
Some religious organizations aren’t comfortable with weapons on their premises while they conduct services, whether in the possession of security personnel or potential attackers. The prospect of gun battles, especially involving untrained volunteers, creates almost as much fear among some religious leaders and congregants as having no security at all. Not all churches, especially small ones, can afford a uniformed security force.

Recent events, noted one leader of a Jewish organization formed in response to security threats, have accentuated the reality that attacks on places of worship “can happen
anywhere.” Our own review of the history of church attacks shows that no religion, denomination, area, or ideology is safe. Conservative evangelicals in rural churches, Jews in urban synagogues, African Americans in small city churches, and liberals in progressive havens have all suffered violent attacks in the last 12 years.  It’s become a universal, non-discriminatory problem.

Our Take
We are not security experts. None of us have been trained in the methodology of law enforcement, police work, or prevention of criminal conduct. We will not, therefore, suggest how places of worship should best protect themselves from violent attack. Doing so would involve us in speculation, and conjecture, a venture we decline.

We have different faith histories and practices. Religion plays varying roles in our lives and religion’s impact may change from time to time within our lives. We do find the attacks of recent years troubling because they threaten a basic freedom we cherish about our American citizenship – the right of worshiping in the way we see fit, without governmental or other interference. Exercising that right necessarily requires a measure of personal safety and security.

That’s why we see this issue as so important and why local, state, and national leader in religion and law enforcement must address it.

Tuesday, December 31, 2019

NEW YEAR’S RESOLUTIONS: MAKING THEM OR NOT


Many Americans are busy making New Year’s resolutions for 2020. The tradition of making New Year’s resolutions dates back to ancient Babylonia. The American Medical Association reported 40-50% of Americans make New Year’s resolutions each year. One British study indicated 88% of respondents failed at keeping their resolutions. Still, people all over the world press on, vowing
each  year they’ll do things for the first time (take up yoga, for example), stop doing others, (smoking, perhaps), or improve at others (get better at golf of tennis). By February, these pledges have often gone out the window, replaced by the habits and behaviors of previous years.


As we did in our last blog, we step away from politics for a few moments and share our thoughts about New Year’s resolutions. Each of us has a different perspective on them:

Rob: Looking at it Conceptually
I’ve made and broken hundreds of New Year’s resolutions. I’ve promised I’d do (or not do) all kinds of things. Participating in this blog, and discussing the subject with my colleagues, made me consider what’s really happened.
In reality, I haven’t made many New Year’s resolutions. I’ve listed goals and targets or come up with random lists of things I might try
doing. I now think a real New Year’s
resolution involves a concept or idea people decide they will adopt that potentially improves the state of their existence. A real resolution isn’t a target list of better golf scores or a commitment that I will darken the door of the health club more often. A real New Year’s Resolution involves adopting an attitude not heretofore exhibited or a concept that, if followed, could promote real change in many aspects of life and permit accomplishments of things truly valued.


So, this year, rather than list as New Year’s resolutions targets for more (or less) of this or that, or random things I’ll try doing in 2020, like taking my son fishing for the first time, I made one resolution: I will exhibit discipline in my activities so I can better execute plans I make.

Henry: It takes Time
I don’t believe I thought about New Year’s resolutions at all during the first 20 years of my life. I don’t  remember my parents talking about them and the practice just wasn’t followed. Perhaps that’s because my mother and father emphasized doing things every day that fostered improvement rather than just at a time certain, like the start of a new year.

The next 40 or so years I paused each year and recognized new beginnings and a chance for renewing all, but I didn’t promise myself I’d do this or that. Those years were busy with family, work, church, and community activities. Each day presented challenges for improving something. Picking specifics at the beginning of a new year seemed a waste of time.

For the last nine years, during this new experience of retirement, I’ve had more time
each day for concentrating on growth in multiple ways. I now believe growth and improvement take time and each day presents a chance for reflection on attacking those challenges. The time this takes doesn’t lend itself to quick fixes, promises, or artificially imposed dates or deadlines. I view each New Year as a time for pondering how thankful I am for the past year and I reflect on how I can carry forward an appreciation for the blessings received.


I hope this approach enables and encourages growth every day, month, and year.

Woodson: A Couple of Dirty Little Secrets
I have a couple of dirty little secrets only my
family knows. After today, you will too.  I’m aworkaholic. I also have a savior complex. I have difficulty saying “no” if people request
my help. When the character traits of a workaholic and someone with a savior complex converge in one person, you get someone often over-extended. 


I have never made a New Year’s resolution. This year will be different. I have finally come to the knowledge friends and loved ones will be just fine with a lot less help from me. This year, I will say “no” when in the past I’ve said “yes.”  At my age, if I am ever going to learn to say “no,” now is the time.

I’m interested in becoming a better person, living each day as if it’s my last. I hope I can complete my financial legacy for my family, contribute to the advancement of racial and economic justice, and expand my knowledge of real estate. I’d also like to just enjoy each of the days I have left. 

So, here’s my New Year’s resolution, folks:  In 2020, I will say “no” to anything that
doesn’t advance the aforementioned interests. I will devote time for reflecting on, studying, and working on just those matters, with rare exceptions.

 
How about you? Are some of you at the same fork in the road? Which road will you take?