Monday, July 30, 2018

TRUMP: TREASON? A CALL TO ACTION



The Responsibility of Patriots: Impeach, Vote Democrat in Mid-term, Take our country back!

We wrote recently about former State Secretary Madeleine Albright’s warning that facist rumblings around the world
threaten democracy.  We didn’t hesitate, and neither did the Secretary in her book Fascism: A Warning, to include President Donald Trump among those about whom we should have such concerns.  Things have only gotten worse since we shared the publication.  More reasons than ever exist for believing Trump existentially threatens democratic institutions in this country and the alliances the United States helped fashion that have kept the western democracies safe in the 70 plus years since the Second World War.

 
We need not detail Trump’s disgraceful performance in Helsinkiafter his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.  Others have said plenty.  As American patriots, the three of us view Trump’s actions there as beyond the pale.  We’ve seen enough to declare Trump a Kleptocrat, if not an outright fascist.  His behavior calls for a response from all responsible Americans.




CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER

As lawyers, we know the dangers of hyperbole.  Lots of people say Trump represents a danger to democracy.  They point to his race baiting after Charlottesville, his disgraceful practice of separating infants and children from their parents at the border as part of a cruel immigration policy, his attacks on the Muslim religion, and his war on the media, Fox News exempted.  What’s different now is Trump’s willingness to bow to a foreign adversary while
disparaging and fighting with our allies – the countries that have stood with us and behind us throughout the post-war era.  No American should forget European members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) came to our aid after September 11, 2001.


Yet, before he went to Finland and groveled next to Putin, there was Trump picking fights with Germany, Great Britain, and other NATO members.  He even audaciously labeled the European Union our “foe.”  Trump behaves as if he’d prefer helping Putin dissolve NATO, leaving the Russian President free to annex Eastern European states and perhaps even reconstitute the old Soviet Union, no doubt a goal of this ruthless ex-KGB agent.  Even if Putin can’t accomplish that, Trump has already helped him diminish the influence of the United States.  Some European countries say they can no longer depend on American leadership.


A TIME FOR ACTION: WHAT TO DO

As we’ve pointed out before in our blogs, the three of us don’t speak with one voice on many issues.  We are different people who, from time to time, express a variety of political positions and preferences.  Yes, we’re mostly Democrats, but we’re not the same kind of Democrat, and we don’t see every issue in partisan terms.  We think of ourselves as patriots and though we each live our patriotism differently, we put country before party.


Having said that, we acknowledge seeing only a partisan solution to the danger Donald Trump’s behavior poses to the country we love.  Ironically enough, in this circumstance, we take our cues from several Republicans.


Steve Schmidt ran John McCain’s 2008 Presidential campaign.  Schmidt has been,throughout his political career
a dedicated adherent to the Republican Party and the conservative movement.  He worked for George W. Bush and helped put two conservative justices on the U.S. Supreme Court. Schmidt now, however, advocates a vote for Democratic candidates in this fall’s mid-term elections as the only way to undo the grave damage he sees Trump doing to America.  Schmidt, at least for the moment, has withdrawn from the Republican Party and sees voting Democratic as the proper response to Trump’s behavior.  Columnist George F. Will, another prominent Republican voice of long standing influence, echoed similar sentiments, urging independents and non-Trump Republicans to vote in a way that will “substantially reduce” the size of the Republican caucus in Congress.


Schmidt and Will see the same thing we do.  Democratic control of the House would open the possibility – even the probability – of impeachment proceedings against Trump.  We wrote about the mechanisms of impeachment in June 2017, noting that process can’t start without Democrats holding the levers of power.


Even if Congress doesn’t remove Trump from office (imagining the two-thirds vote in the Senate required for conviction remains difficult), an impeachment inquiry could reign in Trump’s behavior.  Because House Republicans have stood so strongly behind him, his behavior has gone unchecked.  Democrats who oppose him in Congress sometimes seem like they’re howling in the wind.  Trump hasn’t had to respond to subpoenas, release tax returns, or answer for financial and policy excesses.  With Democrats in control of even one house of Congress, things will change.  That howling may soon resemble a pack of hungry wolves on the trail of a wounded animal.


We think it possible, in fact, Special Counsel Robert Mueller already has much of his case against Trump made.  Mueller, a smart Washington operative, knows putting out his report now, with Republicans remaining in control of the House where impeachment must begin, means that report would 
likely get relegated to the trash can.  If Mueller believes he can’t indict a sitting President, making impeachment the only remedy for Trump’s crimes, Mueller may well have decided he’ll wait and present his report to a more receptive audience.  We can’t imagine a more receptive audience than a Democratic majority in the House of Representatives.  That’s our dream and Trump’s worst nightmare.  


That’s what we think. Tell us what you think.    

            

Monday, July 23, 2018

The NBA - IT'S A NEW WORLD



When we grew up, the National Basketball Association
season ended in late May or early June and the league pretty much left the sports world to Major League Baseball and football previews.  Basketball disappeared until training camps began in October.  My, how things have changed.  


This year the NBA operated a summer league that ran between July 2 and July 17, with games watchable on NBA-TV or ESPN.  Even more important, the NBA now markets its off-season free agent and trading activity so the movement of players, once relegated to the sports section fine print on all except the biggest stars, receives front page treatment in newspapers and “breaking news” status on cable television.  Sports talk radio in every major market – and many smaller ones – crackles with NBA calls all summer.


The Biggest Fish

The presence of four-time league Most Valuable Player LeBron James in the free agent pool made this year’s NBA off season that much more interesting.  Even at 33 and with the wear and tear of 15 NBA seasons (he didn’t play college basketball) on his body, James still has a lot left in the tank.  This year’s NBA playoffs demonstrated that as James carried the undermanned Cleveland Cavilers to the league finals.  That James couldn’t reel in his fourth NBA title (he won two in Miami and the 2016 championship in Cleveland) didn’t diminish the frenzy in seeking his services.


As nearly everyone knows by now, James signed a four year, $154 million contract with the Los Angeles Lakers, likely
shaking up the pecking order in the NBA’s already brutal Western Conference.  James helps form the nucleus of a good Laker team some think could challenge the Houston Rockets and Oklahoma City Thunder for second in the west, behind the seemingly invincible Golden State Warriors.  The Warriors won three of the last four NBA titles and appear headed for another, given the addition of center DeMarcus Cousins via free agency to an already packed lineup that includes Kevin Durant, Step Curry, and Klay Thompson.  


What’s LeBron Up To?

James’s decision to sign with the Lakers raised some eyebrows around the league and in the sports media.  Almost any Eastern Conference team with LeBron James on its roster looked like a prime contender for the league finals.  Even if the best teams – Golden State, Houston, Oklahoma City -- play in the west, anything can happen in one series.  Wouldn’t James have given himself a better shot at another league final by staying in the east?



James certainly had personal reasons to sign with the Lakers.  He owns a home in the Los Angeles area and reportedly he and his family particularly enjoy California.   He’s known to have friends inside and outside basketball based in California he’d enjoy being closer to.   A deeper look, however, suggests basketball considerations, and the current-day motivations NBA players have, drove the decision.    


In Los Angeles, James will find a front office dedicated to winning and run by a man who knows a great deal about getting that done.  Earvin “Magic” Johnson calls the shots for the Lakers now as the team’s President of Basketball Operations.  Johnson, of course, won five championships while playing for the Lakers and has always proclaimed himself about winning, first and foremost.  Given his background, it’s reasonable to view Johnson as a player’s executive someone like James would want in the front office.  Johnson probably can shield James from the drama he often experienced in Cleveland, where the on-court and off-court coordination wasn’t always the best.


Though nobody in the Laker organization is saying it out loud, many basketball observers think James will have a measure of control over how the team plays.  He sometimes had to wrestle that control from the front office, coaches, and other players in Cleveland.  He’s likely been promised that in Los Angeles, with Johnson making the promises.  


From a salary cap standpoint, the Lakers are in an excellent
position to keep adding pieces around James through free agency within the span of James’s contract.  It’s almost certain, for example, the Lakers will make a major run at Golden State’s Thompson when he becomes a free agent next year.  If they reel him in, with one move, the Lakers would have strengthened themselves and weakened a primary rival.  Presumably, Thompson isn’t the only target on Johnson’s list.   Johnson, with James as the anchor, could have the Lakers headed for a title very soon.  

So, the decision LeBron James made to sign with the Lakers might have been mainly about basketball.  Two things motivate superior athletes like James – money and the chance to compete for championships.   Whoever signed James was going to pay him pretty much the same money as the Lakers paid, variations in contract length and exact price due to salary cap considerations notwithstanding.  That left the decision to competitive factors.  Viewed in terms of LeBron James’s long term interest in accumulating NBA championships and the way he bonded with Johnson, his decision to cast his lot with the Lakers seems within the realm of reasonable expectations.